Rubber, PVC, or polyurethane

Which material is suitable for which type of workplace floor?

When purchasing a workplace mat, people often focus first on the profile, color, or dimensions. The material composition of the mat is frequently overlooked, yet it is precisely this factor that determines how the mat performs when exposed to oil, how well it withstands heavy use, and the actual level of comfort it provides to someone standing on it for eight hours a day. Rubber, PVC, and polyurethane are the three materials found across virtually the entire mat industry, and each offers a distinctly different balance of strengths and weaknesses.

Rubber: suitable for industrial conditions

Rubber mats particularly those made from nitrile rubber are the standard in environments where durability and chemical resistance are paramount. They offer excellent slip resistance and can withstand harsh conditions, including exposure to oils and fluids, making rubber a logical choice for workshops, production lines, and other high-demand industrial environments.

This durability stems not only from wear resistance but also from chemical stability. Natural rubber is highly durable, offering resistance to both impact and abrasion; furthermore, it withstands a variety of chemicals, making it easy to clean without damaging the material. Rubber comes in various compositions natural or recycled with natural rubber being biodegradable and eco-friendly, while recycled rubber gives a second life to waste materials such as old tires, making the material attractive from a sustainability perspective as well.

The downside: rubber is heavier and generally more expensive to purchase than PVC. For environments where that weight and investment are not an issue and where chemical exposure, heavy loads on the mat, and prolonged, intensive use are the norm this is an acceptable trade-off.

PVC: lightweight and affordable, but with a limited lifespan.

PVC (polyvinyl chloride) is a synthetic plastic that stands out as a matting material primarily due to its accessibility: PVC mats are lightweight, flexible, and inexpensive to manufacture, and are widely used thanks to their water resistance and low cost. For applications with lower traffic intensity, temporary setups, or situations where budget or ease of transport is the deciding factor, this is precisely where PVC proves its value.

That accessibility comes at a price in the long run. PVC mats represent a more economical option, offering lightweight construction and easy maintenance for light commercial applications where extreme durability is not the primary concern. Moreover, foam-based mats suffer from a well-known degradation issue: they lose their ergonomic cushioning due to irreversible cell compression within 12 to 18 months. This means that a mat purchased to enhance employee comfort can, within a year and a half, actually contribute to increased lower-leg fatigue even if it still looks intact on the surface. It is a risk that often only becomes apparent long after the purchasing decision has been made precisely the kind of hidden cost one overlooks at the time of purchase, but which later takes its toll in the form of frequent replacements.

For permanent, high-traffic workspaces, PVC is therefore more of a short-term solution with long-term costs than a structural investment.

Polyurethane (PU): the comfort material

While rubber excels in rugged durability and PVC in price, polyurethane stands out primarily for its comfort. Polyurethane foam offers superior comfort thanks to exceptional elasticity and shock absorption, making it an ideal choice for office and retail environments where employee comfort is a priority. For staff who spend long periods standing whether at a checkout, a service counter, or in a laboratory that springy quality is key: it means less pressure on the joints and reduced fatigue by the end of a shift.

What is less well known is that, in terms of chemical resistance, polyurethane is on par with rubber or PVC—and even outperforms PVC in certain respects. Technical and industrial research into the construction of conductive mats shows that a polyurethane layer offers lower density, higher heat deflection temperatures, and superior elastomeric properties compared to thermoplastic materials, along with improved bond strength that reduces delamination; furthermore, a mat with a polyurethane inner layer exhibits better dimensional stability and generally superior chemical resistance than a comparable PVC layer. Moreover, polyurethane represents a broader class of materials than is often assumed: it is not a single material but a class of polymers formed by reacting diisocyanates with polyols, allowing manufacturers to adjust the ratio of the two to create PU variants with varying degrees of hardness, elasticity, and resistance to environmental factors. This explains why one PU mat can behave very differently from another, even though they fall under the same material designation.

What does this mean for the choice in practice?

None of the three materials is “the best” in absolute terms; it depends on what happens on the floor:

  • Consider rubber for heavy industrial loads, frequent contact with oils and chemicals, and situations where service life is more important than purchase price—such as workshops, production lines, and environments involving intensive, rough use.
  • Choose PVC for lower usage intensity or temporary applications, or when budget and weight (easy to move and clean) are the primary criteria bearing in mind that, over time, replacement will be required more frequently than with rubber.
  • Choose polyurethane when comfort during prolonged standing is the primary reason for the purchase—such as for checkout staff, laboratory work, or assembly stations with the added benefit that its chemical resistance often surpasses that of PVC.

In reality, many professional mats combine these materials: a wear-resistant top layer on a shock-absorbing base layer, or a PVC base with a polyurethane coating for added durability. This explains why it makes sense to look beyond just “rubber” or “PVC” on the label and consider the precise material composition and the associated test results.

At Base+- this choice of materials is reflected in the composition of the product range: mats featuring a 100% rubber or 100% PVC backing and a base material of PVC or polyurethane. These are tailored to specific use cases ranging from the ‘Economic’ line for general applications to variants specifically developed for oil resistance and grip in industrial environments. Each version undergoes independent testing by TÜV Rheinland for properties such as wear resistance and residual indentation, ensuring that material selection is based on verified data rather than assumptions.

View our full range

Are you unsure which material suits your work environment?

Request the test data for well-founded, tailored advice.

Test data